Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An agency’s legal interpretation in areas outside of its expertise is entitled to no deference.” (citing Russell v. Dep’t of Human Rights, 70 Wn. App. 408, 412, 854 P.2d 1087 (1993))
• “Whether the essence of the work is personal labor is a factual determination.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).