Callanan v. Riggers & Erectors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that “the court must consider the facts and circumstances of each case in making the good cause determination”
• recognizing the public’s interest in knowing how allegations of police torture are investigated and resolved
• noting, inter alia, good cause generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need for judicial action
• noting, inter alia, good cause generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need for judicial action
• requiring an affirmative showing of good cause by movant for all Rule 26(e) protective orders
• finding “good cause” signifies a sound basis or legitimate need for judicial action, such that the Court should balance the interests involved, i.e., harm to the movant and importance of public disclosure, by considering a non-exhaustive list of factors under the facts of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).