Ninth Circuit· 3/30/1984
Callahan v. Woods
Citations
- 736 F.2d 1269
- 87 A.L.R. Fed. 897
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a requirement that a social security number be obtained and disclosed in order to receive welfare is a substantial burden for a “mark of the beast” believer
- declining to award summary judgment on appeal to appellant because “[i]t is possible that the law, before this appeal, was not sufficiently clear to have afforded [appellee] a realistic opportunity to present the relevant facts.”
- noting absence of such evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyD.C. Circuit· 1985-09-03· cited 181×
- USA Petroleum Company v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyNinth Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 107×
- Christian Gospel Church, Inc. v. City and County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 1990-02-27· cited 80×
- The International Society for Krishna Consciousness of New Orleans, Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton RougeFifth Circuit· 1989-07-05· cited 50×
- Crummey v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-30· cited 50×
- Callahan v. WoodsNinth Circuit· 1984-07-05· cited 25×
- George K. Gordon v. The State of IdahoNinth Circuit· 1985-12-19· cited 21×
- The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Missouri CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1988-01-15· cited 18×
- United States v. Thirty Eight (38) Golden Eagles or Eagle PartsD. Nevada· 1986-10-15· cited 16×
- North Valley Baptist Church v. McMahonE.D. California· 1988-09-29· cited 15×
- American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A. v. MeeseN.D. California· 1989-03-24· cited 15×
- United States v. LundquistD. Oregon· 1996-07-30· cited 13×
- Best v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-10-12· cited 11×
- New Life Baptist Church Academy v. Town of East LongmeadowD. Massachusetts· 1987-07-27· cited 8×
- United States v. JimD. Oregon· 1995-03-13· cited 7×
- In Re TurnerN.D. California· 1996-03-11· cited 7×
- Gibson v. BabbittS.D. Florida· 1999-08-27· cited 7×
- International Union v. National Right to Work Legal DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1986-01-21· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1985-04-15· cited 2×
- Kerley Industries, Inc. v. Pima CountyNinth Circuit· 1986-04-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.