Skip to main content
· 12/20/1999

Calik v. Kongable

Citations

  • 990 P.2d 1055
  • 195 Ariz. 496
  • 316 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 26
  • 1999 Ariz. LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that initiative measures are construed to effectuate the intent of the electorate
  • finding that the purpose of Proposition 200 was to treat drag abuse as a disease and public health problem best addressed through drug treatment and education
  • interpreting Proposition 200 and applying rules of statutory construction to interpretation of a statute resulting from an initiative
  • interpreting Proposition 200 and applying rules of statutory construction to interpretation of a statute resulting from an initiative
  • stating “the subsequent enacting body is often not the same as the one that enacted the original legislation”
  • with only a few exceptions, “if the language [of a statute] is clear and unambiguous, we apply it without using other means of statutory construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janet A. Napolitano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.