Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prohibition on all uses except residential use valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zoning Board of Appeals v. Planning & Zoning Commission
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-04-07· cited 63×
• Town of Westford v. Kilburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1973-02-06· cited 45×
• Town of Beacon Falls v. Posick
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 36×
• Griswold v. City of Homer
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-10-25· cited 32×
• Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1973-05-18· cited 16×
• Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise Valley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-05-26· cited 12×
• Zelvin v. Zoning Board of Appeals
  Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1973-03-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 2,940×
• Connor v. Township of Chanhassen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-03-08· cited 43×
• Village of Old Westbury v. Foster
  New York Supreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 10×
• Valley View Village, Inc. v. Proffett
  Sixth Circuit· 1955-04-23· cited 10×

Other cases named Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning Commission

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-07-14