Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/17/2007
C. R. H. v. B. F.
Citations
- 215 Or. App. 479
- 169 P.3d 1286
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1460
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that criminal conduct by itself does not meet the standards defined in ORS 109.324
- concluding that criminal conduct by itself does not meet the standards defined in ORS 109.324
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Haselton, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J. W. V. v. J. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-01· cited 11×
- W. E. F. v. C. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-15· cited 3×
- E. A. R. v. R. B. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-23· cited 3×
- And B. T. V. v. B. J. V. (In re B. J. V.)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-16· cited 2×
- T. S. R. v. J. B. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-31· cited 2×
- M. F. v. H. S. -S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-20· cited 1×
- Wef v. ClmCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-15
- Crh v. BfCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-17
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of Adoption of EderOregon Supreme Court· 1991-11-22· cited 33×
- Stubbs v. WeathersbyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 32×
- Panter v. AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 21×
- Michels v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-26· cited 15×
- Ellis v. KristichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.