Skip to main content
· 10/31/2001

Panter v. Ash

Citations

  • 33 P.3d 1028
  • 177 Or. App. 589
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that father’s garnished wages and tax refunds were incidental in light of his failure to maintain contact with his child and, thus, were not enough to establish his concern for the child
  • finding willful neglect where the father made no efforts to contact or support his child
  • determining whether the father’s neglect was justified by just and sufficient cause
  • determining whether the father's neglect was justified by just and sufficient cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Kistler, Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.