District of Columbia· 3/9/2009
C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.
Citations
- 601 F. Supp. 2d 262
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19493
- 2009 WL 585907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “whether the parties were acting within the scope of a fiduciary relationship is a question of fact for the jury to decide, not a question for the court”
- stating that “the duty is not a means to add new terms to the agreement; it merely requires that the parties behave fairly and reasonably in the performance and enforcement of the contract”
- stating that if indemnitor remains potentially liable “to the party with whom the indemnitee settled, there is no unfairness that needs rectification” because indemnitor was potentially liable to underlying plaintiff “before the settlement and remains” so after settlement
- declining to determine a prevailing party or. award costs because the parties were “nearly in equipoise”
- awarding no costs because plaintiffs and defendants 2 alike were “arguably entitled to costs on the claims that they successfully pursued or defended”
- declining to award costs in a mixed judgment case, without deciding who was the prevailing party, on the ground that the parties were “nearly in equipoise”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John M. Facciola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-02· cited 54×
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-16· cited 38×
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-27· cited 35×
- Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, PllcDistrict of Columbia· 2010-02-12· cited 27×
- Davis v. World Savings Bank, FsbDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-29· cited 21×
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District of Columbia· 2017-03-30· cited 18×
- Gray v. Leisure Life IndustriesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-10-01· cited 13×
- Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc. v. Cafesjian Family Foundation, Inc.District of Columbia· 2010-03-09· cited 12×
- Tereshchuk v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-31· cited 11×
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-29· cited 8×
- B & H National Place, Inc. v. BeresfordDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-27· cited 6×
- Jefferson v. CollinsDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-26· cited 5×
- Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial Inc v. Cafesjian Family Foundation IncDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-22
- Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial Inc v. Cafesjian Family Foundation IncDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-09
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2010-01-20
- Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. v. Airbus HelicoptersDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-25
- Fiberlight, LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-12
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict of Columbia· 2018-10-05
- Gatling v. Jubilee Housing, Inc.District of Columbia· 2021-11-16
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 784×
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 246×
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-05-25· cited 179×
- Christopher G. Pitt, Sr. And Tela Hansom-Pitt v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 148×
- Islamic American Relief Agency v. GonzalesD.C. Circuit· 2007-02-13· cited 147×
- Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-23· cited 119×
- Select Milk Producers, Inc. v. JohannsD.C. Circuit· 2005-03-18· cited 95×
- Allworth v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-12· cited 93×
- Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and CompanyD.C. Circuit· 1988-07-12· cited 88×
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1982-07-30· cited 79×
- Rita Lynn Baker v. John Morrell & Co.Eighth Circuit· 2004-10-29· cited 75×
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-06-11· cited 65×
- In Re Fannie Mae Securities LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2009-01-06· cited 59×
- Urban Investments, Inc. v. BranhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 58×
- Ute Hayman v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 55×
- First National Bank of Louisville v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoFirst Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 50×
- Markovich v. LeavittSupreme Court· 2007-10-01· cited 50×
- Fogg, Matthew v. Ashcroft, JohnD.C. Circuit· 2001-06-22· cited 48×
- Laurent v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 47×
- Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court· 1959-07-02· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.