Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/30/1993
Byrd v. State
Citations
- 98 Md. App. 627
- 634 A.2d 988
- 1993 Md. App. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defense counsel's objection was not properly preserved because it was not made until after the answer was given and under the facts \counsel knew the basis for the objection as soon as the question was asked\
- defense counsel’s objection was not properly preserved because it was not made until after the answer was given and under the facts “counsel knew the basis for the objection as soon as the question was asked”
- attempted subornation of a witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-28· cited 139×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-10· cited 78×
- State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-26· cited 63×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-29· cited 38×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-03· cited 34×
- Tibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-06-04· cited 26×
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-03· cited 17×
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.