New York Court of Appeals· 12/2/2003
Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.
Citations
- 802 N.E.2d 1090
- 1 N.Y.3d 193
- 770 N.Y.S.2d 692
- 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- identifying five factors relevant in assessing whether an employer had sufficient control over a worker, thus creating an employer-employee relationship
- finding waiters as independent contractors when waiters worked at their own discretion, worked for competitors, and received limited instructions
- listing five factors relevant to the “degree of control” analysis
- listing five factors relevant to the “degree of control” analysis
- finding plaintiffs to be independent contractors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: G.B. Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-10-08· cited 11×
- Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 2004-05-04
- Bynog v. CIPRIANI GROUP, INC.New York Court of Appeals· 2003-04-08
- Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 2003-12-02
- Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 2003-04-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.