Skip to main content

Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.

Citations

  • 110 N.H. 36
  • 260 A.2d 111
  • 1969 N.H. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing strict product liability tort theory in addition to negligence and warranty theories of liability
  • noting that a plaintiff may proceed on both an implied warranty claim and one for strict liability
  • plaintiff must prove malfunction of automobile lights caused the accident and arose from a defect present at time of purchase
  • plaintiff must prove that the malfunction of automobile lights caused the accident and that the malfunction arose from a defect present at the time of purchase
  • plaintiff must prove that the malfunction of automobile lights caused the accident and that the malfunction arose from a defect present at the time of purchase
  • adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Griffith, Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.