Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/8/2024
Butorac v. Osmic
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3019
Syllabus
Law-of-the-case doctrine res judicata final, appealable order finality of judgments. Judgment affirmed. Appellant's attempts to \quash\ his direct appeal that had already been decided based on a lack of a final, appealable order fails under the law-of-the-case doctrine, res judicata, and upon the merits.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 377×
- National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-08· cited 317×
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 316×
- State ex rel. Durkin v. UngaroOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-26· cited 79×
- Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 66×
- McAdams v. Mercedes-Benz, USA, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-16· cited 5×
- Butorac v. OsmicOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-01· cited 4×
- Butorac v. OsmicOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.