Butler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court held that the consolidation of two robberies was proper where, during each of the robberies, which occurred ten days apart, a black male was armed with a silver pistol and demanded money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-07-26· cited 53×
• Ex Parte Scott
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-03-20· cited 46×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-06-12· cited 38×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-11-10· cited 26×
• Langham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-06-24· cited 23×
• Yelder v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-10-11· cited 22×
• McConico v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-08-14· cited 16×
• Crawford v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-01-28· cited 14×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-03-30· cited 13×
• Gagliardi v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-11-22· cited 12×
• Ragsdale v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-01-10· cited 11×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-05-14· cited 9×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-05-26· cited 9×
• Avis Dante Hinkle v. State of Alabama.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-07-29· cited 7×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-10-28· cited 153×
• Ex Parte Watson
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-01-29· cited 70×
• Hollenquest v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-10-07· cited 5×
• Hollenquest v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-02-27· cited 4×