California Supreme Court· 1/28/1958
Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.
Citations
- 320 P.2d 500
- 49 Cal. 2d 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The rules 10 concerning negligence and proximate causation which must be explained to the jury are in themselves complicated and difficult to understand.”
- Section 22107 “does not require the 13 driver to know that a turn can be made with safety but only that he must exercise 14 reasonable care[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Schauer, Spence, Shenk, Carter, Traynor, McComb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court· 1974-12-10· cited 472×
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court· 1984-08-30· cited 319×
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-03-16· cited 314×
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-01-23· cited 262×
- Shell Oil Co. v. Winterthur Swiss InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-01-21· cited 212×
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-07-17· cited 195×
- Reinhart v. YoungTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 191×
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court· 1974-10-28· cited 124×
- Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-08-21· cited 112×
- Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court· 1967-11-30· cited 93×
- Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-07-02· cited 91×
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-03-28· cited 91×
- Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-03-04· cited 84×
- Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 82×
- Solgaard v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.California Supreme Court· 1971-12-27· cited 81×
- Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-07-19· cited 74×
- Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1958-11-14· cited 71×
- Lewis v. Buckskin Joe's, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1964-11-30· cited 70×
- Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-04-04· cited 69×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-28· cited 173×
- Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-07· cited 133×
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-08-01· cited 115×
- Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-03-12· cited 89×
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-06-12· cited 88×
- Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-05-08· cited 81×
- Barrera v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-22· cited 63×
- Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-08-08· cited 62×
- Niosi v. Empire Steam LaundryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-06-16· cited 33×
- Jaeger v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-01-11· cited 30×
- Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1956-06-27· cited 28×
- Spear v. LeuenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-04-16· cited 27×
- Johnston v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-03-22· cited 21×
- Guay v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 1947-09-16· cited 20×
- Finley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-12-29· cited 18×
- Washam v. Peerless Automatic Staple MacHine Co.California Court of Appeal· 1941-06-03· cited 16×
- Driver v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-10-11· cited 15×
- Pezzoni v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-12-12· cited 12×
- McMahon v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-05-22· cited 9×
- Lilley v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-11-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.