D. Massachusetts· 5/19/1999
Bussie v. Allmerica Financial Corp.
Citations
- 50 F. Supp. 2d 59
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7792
- 1999 WL 336287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that favorable reaction of class to settlement, albeit not dispositive, constitutes strong evidence of fairness of proposed settlement
- suggesting that a court should “review[] the objectors’ stated concerns generously, as it would those presented by any pro se litigant”
- finding the class representative to be adequate because, “[l]ike the [c]lass overall, [the plaintiff] fell victim to [the defendant’s] alleged scheme and, as such, the representatives and the [c]lass share the same interest in seeking remediation for their injury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Allmerica Financial Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-08-06· cited 71×
- Varacallo v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceD. New Jersey· 2005-02-15· cited 48×
- Benchmark Bank v. Crumley (In Re Crumley)N.D. Texas· 2010-04-08· cited 33×
- In Re Tyco Intern., Ltd. Multidistrict LitigationD. New Hampshire· 2007-12-19· cited 32×
- Rolland v. CellucciD. Massachusetts· 2000-01-10· cited 24×
- Bezdek v. Vibram USA Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2015-01-16· cited 21×
- Grove v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceS.D. Iowa· 2001-04-30· cited 15×
- New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund v. First Databank, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2009-03-17· cited 5×
- Allmerica Financial Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-04-30· cited 3×
- Boynton v. Headwaters, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 2008-08-26· cited 3×
- Milkman v. American Travellers Life InsurancePhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-03-28· cited 1×
- United States v. MassachusettsD. Massachusetts· 2012-06-18· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneSecond Circuit· 1983-01-26· cited 443×
- School District of Lancaster v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.Third Circuit· 1986-05-01· cited 291×
- Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston UniversityFirst Circuit· 1990-01-24· cited 228×
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationD. New Jersey· 1997-03-17· cited 180×
- Dura Corp. v. TWM Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 175×
- Coventry Sewage Associates v. Dworkin Realty Co.First Circuit· 1995-11-22· cited 166×
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)S.D. New York· 1991-06-27· cited 113×
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityD. Massachusetts· 1997-01-28· cited 112×
- In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships LitigationS.D. New York· 1997-03-20· cited 106×
- Flora Santana v. Jenaro Collazo Collazo, Flora Santana, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Jenaro CollazoFirst Circuit· 1983-09-30· cited 62×
- Shields v. KeatingD. Arizona· 1992-01-07· cited 44×
- Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 1997-12-31· cited 43×
- Lake v. First Nationwide BankE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-09-14· cited 27×
- States of NY and Md. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-10-17· cited 22×
- M. Berenson Co. v. Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1987-06-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.