Nevada Supreme Court· 12/17/1981
Bushnell v. State
Citations
- 637 P.2d 529
- 97 Nev. 591
- 1981 Nev. LEXIS 599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing because the \sole reason\ for the district court's imposition of a harsher sentence was the defendant's decision to maintain his innocence
- stating that “imposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion”
- stating that \[i]mposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant's exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion\
- stating that “[imposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion”
- “Imposition of a harsher sentence based upon the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion....”
- a court may not impose a harsher sentence based upon a defendant's exercise of his constitutional rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brake v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-05-22· cited 248×
- Brown v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 33×
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-11-02· cited 30×
- Dzul v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-10-31· cited 24×
- State v. KellisIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-02-16· cited 13×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1983-10-19· cited 9×
- TALLEY (OMAR) v. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2025-12-04· cited 2×
- State v. GattusoNevada Supreme Court· 1992-01-24
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court· 1969-01-20· cited 1,132×
- Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1966-11-09· cited 168×
- In Re LewallenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-02-09· cited 112×
- United States v. Guadalupe Rodringuez, Victoriano Lozano Vega, Rolando Garcia and Rene Castillo TamezFifth Circuit· 1974-08-05· cited 46×
- Tellis v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 18×
- State v. KeithWashington Supreme Court· 1975-12-11· cited 17×
- Stevenson v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court· 1976-09-17· cited 2×
- Wammack v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court· 1970-03-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.