Skip to main content

Bushnell v. State

Citations

  • 637 P.2d 529
  • 97 Nev. 591
  • 1981 Nev. LEXIS 599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing because the \sole reason\ for the district court's imposition of a harsher sentence was the defendant's decision to maintain his innocence
  • stating that “imposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion”
  • stating that \[i]mposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant's exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion\
  • stating that “[imposition of a harsher sentence based on the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion”
  • “Imposition of a harsher sentence based upon the defendant’s exercise of his constitutional rights is an abuse of discretion....”
  • a court may not impose a harsher sentence based upon a defendant's exercise of his constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.