Burton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proper date to allege in an enhancement allegation is the date that the sentence was imposed after revocation of probation, rather than the date of the original judgment of conviction
• any prior conviction relevant under Article 37.07 § 3(a) is admissible.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cole v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-01-28· cited 101×
• Plessinger v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-12· cited 71×
• Rios v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-19· cited 53×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-10· cited 31×
• Sanders v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-10· cited 25×
• Aaron v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-16· cited 17×
• Davis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-12-27· cited 17×
• Brown v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-05-16· cited 16×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-01· cited 8×
• State v. Perez
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1997-07-17· cited 6×
• Helton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-26· cited 5×
• James Bolivar Sanders, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1992-06-10
• Vincent Depaul Stredic v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2019-11-26