Texas Supreme Court· 5/21/1952
Burt v. Lochausen
Citations
- 249 S.W.2d 194
- 151 Tex. 289
- 1952 Tex. LEXIS 397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering judgment non obstante veredicto \in the light of the record as a whole\
- considering judgment non obstante veredicto \in the light of the record as a whole\
- considering judgment non obstante veredicto \in the light of the record as a whole\
- \[W]e must consider all the testimony in the record from the standpoint most favorable to the plaintiff.\
- ″We must consider all the testimony in the record from the standpoint most favorable to the plaintiff.″
- “[W]e must consider all the testimony in the record from the standpoint most favorable to the plaintiff.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffin, Wilson, Garwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
272 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 2005-06-10· cited 10,088×
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-05-08· cited 768×
- St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court· 2002-11-05· cited 595×
- Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 508×
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court· 1997-07-09· cited 383×
- Leyva v. PachecoTexas Supreme Court· 1962-06-27· cited 315×
- Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court· 1992-01-29· cited 253×
- Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court· 1969-03-26· cited 152×
- Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1974-01-09· cited 138×
- Harbin v. SealeTexas Supreme Court· 1970-12-09· cited 129×
- Dodd v. Texas Farm Products Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1979-01-31· cited 84×
- Carrow v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-29· cited 68×
- Winograd v. Clear Lake City Water AuthorityTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-05-30· cited 61×
- Swinney v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-31· cited 57×
- Sheffield Division, Armco Steel Corporation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1964-02-26· cited 55×
- Union Transports, Inc. v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-10-31· cited 48×
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-08-12· cited 46×
- Texas Power & Light Company v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1964-12-31· cited 45×
- Schafer v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-07-21· cited 38×
- Miles v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-22· cited 34×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1941-06-04· cited 215×
- American National Insurance v. DenkeTexas Supreme Court· 1936-06-17· cited 102×
- Rogers v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court· 1951-06-13· cited 62×
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. DenkeTexas Commission of Appeals· 1936-06-17· cited 45×
- Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. SheltonTexas Commission of Appeals· 1919-02-19· cited 24×
- Burt v. LochausenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-07-20· cited 22×
- Franzen v. JasonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1942-11-19· cited 14×
- Fidelity Union Life Ins. Co. v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1933-06-08· cited 10×
Other cases named Burt v. Lochausen
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.