Skip to main content

Burrell v. State

Citations

  • 340 Md. 426
  • 667 A.2d 161
  • 1995 Md. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • uphold-ing State’s decision to nolle pros a simple robbery charge because the only rational inference, in light of evidence that defendant had employed a deadly weapon, was that defendant committed an armed robbery
  • upholding State's decision to nolle pros a simple robbery charge because the only rational inference, in light of evidence that defendant had employed a deadly weapon, was that defendant committed an armed robbery
  • “In considering whether an entry of nolle prosequi to a lesser included offense is unfair to the defendant, . . . the evidence must . . . be such that the jury could rationally convict only on the lesser included offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.