Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/11/1977
Burns v. Gould
Citations
- 172 Conn. 210
- 374 A.2d 193
- 20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1294
- 1977 Conn. LEXIS 884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that contracts for sale of securities expressly excluded from § 42a-l-206 because such contracts are specifically covered by General Statutes § 42a-8-319
- finding contract concerning services in exchange for stock would be covered by statute of frauds providing for sale of securities
- statute of frauds inapplicable to oral agreement to transfer stock of corporation with real estate interests
- \Certainly a defendant who has wrongfully prevented the other party from completing performance cannot set up the nonperformance of the other as a defense.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, MacDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-04· cited 250×
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 114×
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 107×
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-04-10· cited 86×
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-07-19· cited 68×
- Hall v. Horizon House Microwave, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-04-17· cited 62×
- Worrell v. Multipress, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-09-13· cited 61×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-28· cited 58×
- Barry v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-09-13· cited 51×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-03· cited 47×
- Charles Fisher v. First Stamford Bank and Trust CompanyFirst Circuit· 1984-12-20· cited 37×
- Borkowski v. SachetiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-10-01· cited 34×
- Lamb v. Emhart Corp.Second Circuit· 1995-02-13· cited 33×
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-18· cited 19×
- Preston v. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-09-06· cited 17×
- Karanian v. MaulucciSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-18· cited 15×
- Byrd v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-08-23· cited 10×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-05-03· cited 9×
- Maurer v. E.A. Gralia Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-10-05· cited 7×
- William Raveis Real Estate, Inc. v. StawskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-15· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-08-27· cited 56×
- Anderson v. ZweigbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-04-25· cited 34×
- Hewson v. Peterman Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-12-12· cited 30×
- Pitt v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-03-16· cited 26×
- Wm. Rogers Manufacturing Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-02-17· cited 25×
- Baldassarre v. Rare Metals Derivatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 23×
- Franklin v. Matoa Gold Min. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1907-12-28· cited 23×
- Carter v. BartekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-06-07· cited 19×
- Connelly v. DevoeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1871-02-15· cited 17×
- Spinney v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-11-13· cited 17×
- Melvin Hiller, and Philip Stoller (57) (Stoller Dismissed) v. The Franklin Mint, Inc. And Joseph M. SegalThird Circuit· 1973-07-26· cited 15×
- Scarpinato v. National Patent Development Corp.New York Supreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 11×
- Corbin v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1867-09-15· cited 9×
- White v. DrewNew York Supreme Court· 1878-06-15· cited 3×
- Lattavo v. Green Acres, Inc.Mercer County Court of Common Pleas· 1969-04-08· cited 1×
Other cases named Burns v. Gould
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.