Burns v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[s]ince [both the plaintiff and the defendant] were of the Jewish religion they felt compelled to secure 'gets' from their prior spouses in order to properly enter into a Jewish contract of marriage known as a 'ketubbah'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Marriage of Goldman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-30· cited 17×
• Tilsen v. Benson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-09-05· cited 12×
• Aflalo v. Aflalo
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-02-29· cited 10×
• Segal v. Segal
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-12-19· cited 7×
• Mayer-Kolker v. Kolker
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-28· cited 1×
• Ava Satz v. Allen Satz
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2023-08-18
• S.E. v. Edelstein
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 806×
• Leslie Blau Co. v. Alfieri
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-02-28· cited 54×
• Minkin v. Minkin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-07-22· cited 18×
• Leslie Blau Co. v. Reitman
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-07-11· cited 15×
• Skillman v. Skillman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-10-06· cited 14×
• Arabia v. Zisman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-06-21· cited 7×