S.E. v. Edelstein

Citations

• 246 N.E.3d 1
• 2024 Ohio 1090

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by granting appellee's pro se Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss where appellants' alleged claims of breach of contract, loss of consortium, and intentional interference with a contract were, in actuality, claims alleging a breach of a promise to marry or alienation of affection, amatory claims that were abolished by R.C. 2305.29.