Burnham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because voluntary intoxication is a valid defense to specific intent crimes, testimony concerning appellant’s intoxication, if otherwise admissible, was relevant to appellant’s defense
• expert may give opinion based on reasonable inferences from facts in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lowe
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-09-17· cited 16×
• Weaver v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-11-25· cited 10×
• Dan & Sherman v. Serrano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-12· cited 2×
• Jefferson Eugene Davis v. Gilchrist County Sheriff's Office
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cirack v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-07-05· cited 60×
• Gurganus v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 57×
• Parker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-01-07· cited 40×
• Fouts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-07-06· cited 36×
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-07-25· cited 27×
• Bender v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-30· cited 23×
• Britts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1947-05-02· cited 18×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-11· cited 8×