Skip to main content
· 7/12/1972

Burnett v. Caho

Citations

  • 285 N.E.2d 619
  • 7 Ill. App. 3d 266
  • 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff lost his eye and was given an artificial eye
  • plaintiff’s lost right eye was objective disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dixon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.