· 5/12/1989
Karl L. Pomer and Claire L. Pomer v. Dennis Schoolman and James King, Counterplaintiffs-Appellants v. Deere & Company, Counterdefendant-Appellee
Citations
- 875 F.2d 1262
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The close of the evidence is awfully late in a lawsuit to move for an amendment to the complaint, unless the purpose is merely to conform the pleadings to the evidence; such an amendment is not untimely even if sought after judgment.”
- “The close of the evidence is awfully late in a lawsuit to move for an amendment to the complaint, unless the purpose is merely to conform the pleadings to the evidence; such an amendment is not untimely even if sought after judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Posner, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.