Burley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and involuntary commitment pursuant to the Baker Act,” but “revers[ing] the order under review and remand[ing] to allow the parties’ attorneys to make closing arguments.”
• holding “that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and involuntary commitment pursuant to the Baker Act,” but “revers[ing] the order under review and remand[ing] to allow the parties’ attorneys to make closing arguments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hogue v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-22
• C. H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Addington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
• Herring v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
• Humphrey v. Cady
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 784×
• Shuman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-05-25· cited 36×
• Pullen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-13· cited 35×
• Chalk v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-04· cited 15×
• Ibur v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-16· cited 8×
• Feiler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-18· cited 5×
• Madden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-24· cited 2×