Ibur v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a denial of the due process right to be heard prior to the deprivation of one's liberty is fundamental error
• holding appellant had a due process right to testify at hearing for involuntary commitment because involuntary committees have the right to be present, represented by counsel, and heard
• “Denial of the due process right to be heard prior to deprivation of one’s liberty is fundamental error which may be raised on appeal even if not preserved below.”
• “Because involuntary commitment is a substantial deprivation of liberty at which fundamental due process protections must attach, the patient cannot be denied the right to be present, to be represented by counsel, and to be heard.”
• “Because involuntary commitment is a substantial deprivation of liberty at which fundamental due process protections must attach, dre patient cannot be denied the right to be present, to be represented by counsel, and to be heard.”
• “Because involuntary commitment is a substantial deprivation of liberty at which fundamental due process protections must attach, the patient cannot be denied the right to be present, to be represented by counsel, and to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).