Burkhardt v. Lindsay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment under similar facts because “[t]he jury will have to decide whether to credit [the debt collector’s] account records or plaintiffs testimony”
• dismissing a claim under § 1692f at the summary judgment stage as “redundant” where the plaintiffs other claims were “specifically addressed” by other provisions of the FDCPA
• dismissing a claim under § 1692f at the summary judgment stage as “redundant” where the plaintiffs other claims were “specifically addressed” by other provisions of the FDCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).