Burke v. Fine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that without explicit contractual language stating otherwise, when an employment contract expires its restrictive covenants expire as well
• “If we accepted [Wagner’s] argument, we would have to rewrite the contract, and insert words the parties never agreed to, which we do not have the authority to do.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Polaris Sales, Inc.
  D. Maine· 2003-04-04· cited 11×
• Diversified Dynamics Corp. v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-08· cited 3×
• Allan Block Corp. v. County Materials Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2008-12-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 104×
• Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-06-25· cited 60×
• Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-28· cited 38×
• Storz Broadcasting Co. v. Courtney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-07-20· cited 32×
• Sanz v. RT Aerospace Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15· cited 13×
• Grossman v. Sherman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-09-17· cited 7×
• Nimis v. St. Paul Turners
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-09-06· cited 4×
• Perry Kaye v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-02-01· cited 2×
• Roberts v. Baumgartner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-08-12· cited 1×