Skip to main content
· 4/18/2000

Burke v. Fine

Citations

  • 608 N.W.2d 909
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1526
  • 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 346
  • 2000 WL 385415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that without explicit contractual language stating otherwise, when an employment contract expires its restrictive covenants expire as well
  • “If we accepted [Wagner’s] argument, we would have to rewrite the contract, and insert words the parties never agreed to, which we do not have the authority to do.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barry, Peterson, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.