Skip to main content

Burgess v. State

Citations

  • 313 S.W.3d 844
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 3661
  • 2010 WL 1946782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ―Burgess‘s challenge to the commissioners court‘s order is not an assertion that the order is void, and . . . the challenge may not be made in this collateral bond forfeiture proceeding but must instead be raised in a separate action.‖
  • “Burgess’s challenge to the commissioners court’s order is not an assertion that the order is void, and . . . the challenge may not be made in this collateral bond forfeiture proceeding but must instead be raised in a separate action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, McCoy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.