20801, INC. v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alcohol providers have the burden of proof on the first two elements of the Act’s safe-harbor defense
• explaining that we indulge every reasonable inference and resolve any doubts in the nonmovant’s favor
• recognizing employer bears burden of proof on first two elements of section 106.14’s safe harbor defense
• recognizing employer bears burden of proof on first two elements of section 106.14’s safe harbor defense
• reviewing court takes as true all evidence favorable to non-movant, and indulges every reasonable inference and resolves any doubts in non-movant’s favor
• requiring the reviewing court to indulge every reasonable inference and resolve any doubts in the nonmovant’s favor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).