· 4/11/2008
Buntion v. Quarterman
Citations
- 524 F.3d 664
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7758
- 2008 WL 1023202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
- distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
- “. . . .because Liteky and Berger both rely exclusively on statutory law (neither case even mentions the Due Process Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Clement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.