Skip to main content
· 4/11/2008

Buntion v. Quarterman

Citations

  • 524 F.3d 664
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7758
  • 2008 WL 1023202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
  • distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
  • “. . . .because Liteky and Berger both rely exclusively on statutory law (neither case even mentions the Due Process Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.