Fifth Circuit· 4/11/2008
Buntion v. Quarterman
Citations
- 524 F.3d 664
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7758
- 2008 WL 1023202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
- distinguishing a state court’s “legal error” from the kind of “unreasonable factual determination” evaluated under § 2254(d)(2)
- “. . . .because Liteky and Berger both rely exclusively on statutory law (neither case even mentions the Due Process Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Clement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richardson v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 31×
- Handley v. ChapmanFifth Circuit· 2009-10-29· cited 29×
- Cantu v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2011-01-26· cited 24×
- Frederick Grim v. Marshall FisherFifth Circuit· 2016-03-08· cited 20×
- United States v. Norman VarnerFifth Circuit· 2020-01-15· cited 18×
- Nanon Williams v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2012-06-19· cited 17×
- State v. CaneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-09-24· cited 8×
- Kuantau Reeder v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenFifth Circuit· 2020-10-20· cited 7×
- Carl Buntion v. Bobby Lumpkin, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2020-12-14· cited 6×
- Barney v. ConwayW.D. New York· 2010-08-06· cited 5×
- Watts v. BrewerFifth Circuit· 2011-03-04· cited 5×
- Mendez v. QuartermanS.D. Texas· 2009-06-04· cited 3×
- State v. LegerLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2017-11-15· cited 3×
- Lynch v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsM.D. Florida· 2012-09-25· cited 2×
- Kuantau Reeder v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenFifth Circuit· 2020-11-09
- Young, Clinton LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2021-09-22
- Buntion v. LumpkinFifth Circuit· 2022-04-20
- Jimenez v. GuerreroFifth Circuit· 2025-04-04
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 3,241×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 2,485×
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 2,322×
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 1,476×
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-11-08· cited 1,331×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court· 1972-11-14· cited 834×
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 788×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-01-31· cited 748×
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 705×
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
- Gribble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-20· cited 251×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 208×
- MICHAEL W. RYAN, PETITIONER—APPELLANT v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, DIRECTOR, STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES RESPONDENT—APPELLEEEighth Circuit· 2004-12-13· cited 113×
- Foster v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-10-03· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.