C.D. California· 10/24/1986
Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick
Citations
- 646 F. Supp. 492
- 55 U.S.L.W. 2268
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here can be no question that, in the absence of some overriding governmental interest such as national security, the First Amendment protects com- munications with foreign audiences to the same extent as communications within our borders.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeNinth Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 490×
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information AgencyNinth Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 74×
- Dkt Memorial Fund Ltd. v. Agency for International Development, Dkt Memorial Fund Ltd. v. Agency for International DevelopmentD.C. Circuit· 1989-10-10· cited 61×
- Nicholas J. Boroff v. Van Wert City Board of Education John Basinger William Clifton and David FroelichSixth Circuit· 2000-07-26· cited 42×
- Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-02-28· cited 32×
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information AgencyNinth Circuit· 1992-03-12· cited 17×
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. CattoC.D. California· 1993-03-01· cited 6×
- Soojung Jang v. Trs. of St. Johnsbury Acad.D. Vermont· 2018-07-06· cited 4×
- Lind v. GrimmerD. Hawaii· 1993-04-20· cited 2×
- Yahoo Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'AntisemitismeNinth Circuit· 2006-01-11
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court· 1970-03-03· cited 3,186×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,658×
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court· 1966-10-17· cited 1,655×
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court· 1931-06-01· cited 1,633×
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 1,516×
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1945-01-15· cited 1,292×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.