Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/15/1963
Bulleri v. Chicago Transit Authority
Citations
- 190 N.E.2d 476
- 41 Ill. App. 2d 95
- 1963 Ill. App. LEXIS 490
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding closing arguments that are unsupported by the evidence are improper
- finding it improper for counsel to argue to the jury facts in his own knowledge, not testified to by any witness
- finding it improper for counsel to argue to the jury facts in his own knowledge, not testified to by any witness
- finding it improper for counsel to argue to the jury facts in his own knowledge, not testified to by any witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burman, English, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ledingham v. Blue Cross Plan for Hospital Care of Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-06-12· cited 113×
- Lewis v. Cotton Belt Route-St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-26· cited 76×
- South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-03-20· cited 63×
- Chavez v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-10-26· cited 38×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-01-09· cited 30×
- Champion v. KnasiakAppellate Court of Illinois· 1974-12-13· cited 29×
- Profit Management Development, Inc. v. Jacobson, Brandvik & Anderson, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-12-09· cited 27×
- Illinois State Trust Co. v. Walker Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-06-07· cited 27×
- People v. VanderwerffAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-24· cited 24×
- Geisberger v. QuincyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-02-01· cited 24×
- Charpentier v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-17· cited 22×
- Higgins v. HermesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-07-13· cited 21×
- Thamara Fenolio v. Charles Smith and Colcord-Wright MacHinery & Supply CompanySeventh Circuit· 1986-09-23· cited 20×
- Vandaveer v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-12-31· cited 20×
- Tabe v. AusmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-02-09· cited 18×
- Osborne v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1968-09-19· cited 17×
- Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-03· cited 13×
- Dept. of Transp. v. First Bank of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-05· cited 12×
- City of Chicago v. BairdAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-03-17· cited 12×
- Lake County Forest Preserve District v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-20· cited 12×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mattice v. KlawansIllinois Supreme Court· 1924-04-14· cited 34×
- Jacobson v. National Dairy Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1961-08-21· cited 30×
- Durkin v. LewitzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1955-01-04· cited 29×
- Appel v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1913-10-28· cited 26×
- Beery v. BreedAppellate Court of Illinois· 1941-08-07· cited 24×
- Forest Preserve District v. Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1945-09-19· cited 20×
- In re Estate of SanduskyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-10-25· cited 20×
- Peoria, Bloomington & Champaign Traction Co. v. VanceIllinois Supreme Court· 1908-04-23· cited 19×
- Barker v. BarkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1962-06-06· cited 9×
- Ravenscroft v. StullIllinois Supreme Court· 1917-10-23· cited 9×
- McWilliams v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1949-11-18· cited 7×
- McNeff v. White Eagle Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1938-02-28· cited 4×
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. ShambergAppellate Court of Illinois· 1938-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.