Tabe v. Ausman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jury’s analysis here might well have concluded with a verdict in favor of the defendant doctors without reaching the [disputed] element ***”
• “there is no precedent that holds the giving of the sole proximate cause instruction results in prejudice to a plaintiff’
• \The jury's analysis here might well have concluded with a verdict in favor of the defendant doctors without reaching the [disputed] element ***\
• \there is no precedent that holds the giving of the sole proximate cause instruction results in prejudice to a plaintiff\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).