Bulfin v. Eli Lilly & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding the \actually and necessarily litigated\ requirement as a fourth prong to the three-part test discussed above
• noting the prior distinction and holding Arizona law does not recognize it and that it is not required by Illinois pubhc policy
• adding the \actually and necessarily litigated\ requirement as a fourth prong to the three-part test discussed above

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).