Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring repeatedly to the “intent to harass” as a criterion of section 12-341.01(0
• conspiracy and contractual interference claims against members of medical conduct board raised issue of irregularity of medical misconduct proceedings that could have been raised during those proceedings
• “No timely appeal having been taken, the decision of the board is conclusively presumed to be just, reasonable[,] and lawful.”
• failure to timely 20 appeal the decision of the Board means the decision is “conclusively presumed to be just, 21 reasonable and lawful”
• statute’s use of “may” rather than “shall” does not render it permissive
• “if the propriety of the [board’s] revocation order has been finally adjudicated, its propriety is conclusively established for purposes of any subsequent suit between [the board and the plaintiff] ... even if that lawsuit involves a different claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).