Buffalo Field Campaign v. Zinke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding when the Fish and Wildlife Service arbitrarily and capriciously “applied an improperly heightened standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pam Squared at Texarkana, LLC v. Azar
  District of Columbia· 2020-01-22
• Native Village of Eklutna v. United States Department of the Interior
  District of Columbia· 2021-09-22
• Buffalo Field Campaign v. Bernhardt
  District of Columbia· 2022-01-12
• Vasquez v. Wormuth
  District of Columbia· 2025-07-07

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
• Unnamed case
  D.C. Circuit· 1999-10-01· cited 222×
• Palisades General Hospital Inc. v. Leavitt
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-10-14· cited 58×
• North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. Gutierrez
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-12-16· cited 49×
• Marcum v. Salazar
  District of Columbia· 2010-11-05· cited 44×
• Price Ex Rel. J.P. v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 36×
• Blue Ocean Institute v. Gutierrez
  District of Columbia· 2008-11-12· cited 19×
• Colorado River Cutthroat Trout v. Dirk Kempthorne
  District of Columbia· 2006-09-07· cited 15×
• Center for Biological Diversity v. Morgenweck
  D. Colorado· 2004-12-17· cited 15×
• Moden v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
  D. Oregon· 2003-09-03· cited 9×
• Humane Society of the United States v. Pritzker
  District of Columbia· 2014-11-14· cited 5×