Palisades General Hospital Inc. v. Leavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s jurisdiction was “only to vacate the Secretary’s decision ... and to remand for further action consistent with its opinion”
• holding that the district court did not have jurisdiction to order the plaintiff hospital’s reclassification after finding that the agency erred in rejecting data submitted in support of the reclassification
• finding that the district court “sits as an appellate tribunal” and has no “jurisdiction to order specific relief”
• stating that district court lacked authority to “order specific relief’ after vacating agency decision
• \[T]he district court had jurisdiction only to vacate the Secretary's decision rejecting the hospital's revised wage data and to remand for further action consistent with its opinion.\
• “[W]hen a procedure is challenged solely in order to reverse an individual . . . decision” covered by a bar to judicial review, “judicial review is not permitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).