District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/14/2005
Buchman v. Canard
Citations
- 926 So. 2d 390
- 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19960
- 2005 WL 3409732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that doctrine of law of the case applies to a per curiam decision of the appellate courts
- noting that the doctrine of law of the case applies to a per curiam decision of the appellate court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Levy, Ramirez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 230×
- Mitzenmacher v. MitzenmacherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 14×
- Bueno v. De KHAWLYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-05· cited 9×
- Shephard v. OuelleteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 4×
- Buchman v. CanardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.