Skip to main content
· 6/12/1979

Buchanan v. Prickett & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 279 N.W.2d 855
  • 203 Neb. 684
  • 1979 Neb. LEXIS 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the rule does apply to volunteers under assumption-of-the-risk principles
  • applying the Fireman’s Rule to a volunteer firefighter and noting that volunteer firefighters “although uncompensated, undertake the same duties as paid [firefighters]”
  • “Attempting to distinguish between ‘firefighting’ and ‘rescue’ operations is unacceptable .... [T]he firelighters] who [operate] the hoses or pumps are in fact as much a part of the rescue effort as those who [operate] the ladders or the nets or who carry victims to safety.”
  • fireman barred from recovering for undertaking risk which he has “engaged to encounter by virtue of his employment and one which it is his duty to accept ... ”
  • \He has suffered additional damages by reason of pain and suffering and time lost from his regular employment as an electrical lineman and a moonlighting job in a feed mill.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, White, Tesar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.