Younce v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “compelling” reasons to retain classification system: “We do not choose to erase our developed jurisprudence for a blank slate. Common law classifications continue to determine the duty owed by an owner or occupier of land in Washington.”
• \We... reaffirm use of common law classifications to determine the duty of care owed by an owner or occupier of land\
• \We . . . reaffirm use of common law classifications to determine the duty of care owed by an owner or occupier of land\
• discussion of the common law classifications of entrants upon real property
• discussion of the common law classifications of entrants upon real property
• “[0]ther courts have found that the following factors should be considered by the jury: (1) the circumstances under which the entrant was on the property; (2) the foreseeability of the injury or damage given the type of condition involved; (3) the nature of the property and its uses; (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).