Buchanan v. Canada Dry Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the bottler also used the Canada Dry name rather than its own in the telephone directory and in answering its telephone
• where evidence that the contractor used the employer’s insignias, had no telephone listing of its own, and shared the employer’s business address was held to create a question of fact on this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).