McMullan v. Georgia Girl Fashions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a label assigned by contract “is not necessarily controlling for we may look to the contents [of the contract] to determine the character of the relationship created”
• we look to the contents of the agreement to determine the character of the relationship created
• “Where the question of agency vel non rests upon a written document and inferences deduced therefrom, as in the instant case, the issue presented is a question of law for the trial court since construction of written contracts is exclusively for the judge.”
• “Where the question of agency vel non rests upon a written document and inferences deduced therefrom, as in the instant case, the issue presented is a question of law for the trial court since construction of written contracts is exclusively for the judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).