Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 4/21/1997
Bruzga v. PMR Architects, P.C.
Citations
- 141 N.H. 756
- 693 A.2d 401
- 1997 N.H. LEXIS 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- superseding cause–-defendant must show that superseding event “breaks the causal connection” between its conduct and plaintiff’s injuries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broderick, Horton, Others, Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patton v. BickfordKentucky Supreme Court· 2016-04-01· cited 115×
- Karen Jutzi-Johnson, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Johnson, Deceased v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2001-09-04· cited 74×
- Mikell v. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NO. 33Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-05-15· cited 70×
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-04-20· cited 64×
- Kristin Beul v. Asse International, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2000-11-15· cited 39×
- Moore v. Western Forge Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-11-15· cited 28×
- State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-10-02· cited 25×
- Royer v. Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-11-23· cited 19×
- Appeal of Baldoumas Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-08-01· cited 8×
- Estate of Lyche v. Washington CountyNinth Circuit· 2006-03-16· cited 1×
- Beul, Kristin v. ASSE Int'l, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2000-11-15
- Jutzi-Johnson, Karen v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2001-09-04
- Appeal of Pelmac Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-10-13
- Bernier v. Simon-Telelect, et al.D. New Hampshire· 1998-06-02
- Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalD. New Hampshire· 2010-08-12
- Unity School District v. Vaughn Associates, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2017-01-20
- Hugel v. Milberg, Weiss, et al.D. New Hampshire· 1998-03-24
- Williamson v. Odyssey HouseD. New Hampshire· 2000-11-01
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-02-19· cited 231×
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-11-30· cited 148×
- Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-11-04· cited 94×
- Simpson v. CalivasSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-09-21· cited 87×
- McLaughlin v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-05-09· cited 68×
- Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-04-09· cited 59×
- Pretty on Top v. City of HardinMontana Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 50×
- City of Belen v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 46×
- Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-03-07· cited 46×
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 45×
- Spherex, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-10-14· cited 44×
- City of Mounds View v. WalijarviSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-17· cited 43×
- Wright v. Creative CorporationColorado Court of Appeals· 1972-04-25· cited 37×
- Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-10-24· cited 37×
- Honey v. Barnes HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-02-18· cited 32×
- Easterday v. MasielloSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-07· cited 32×
- Bagley v. Controlled Environment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-01-06· cited 31×
- Mayer v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-07· cited 30×
- LeBlanc v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-01-28· cited 30×
- Gardner v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-03-11· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.