Skip to main content

Bruni v. Tatsumi

Citations

  • 46 Ohio St. 2d 127
  • 346 N.E.2d 673
  • 75 Ohio Op. 2d 184
  • 1976 Ohio LEXIS 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the plaintiff must have evidence that the defendant was unskillful or negligent and his want of skill or care caused injury to the plaintiff
  • expert must be qualified to express an opinion concerning the specific standard of care that prevails in the medical community in which the alleged malpractice took place
  • “The issue as to whether the physician and surgeon has proceeded in the treatment of a patient with the requisite standard of care and skill must ordinarily be determined from the testimony of medical experts”
  • medical malpractice requires a plaintiff to establish (1) the applicable standard of care within the medical community, (2) the defendant breached that standard of care, and (3) the breach of the standard of care proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury
  • the injury was proximately caused by the doing of some particular thing that a physician of ordinary skill, care and diligence would not have done under similar conditions or by the failure to do some particular thing that such a physician would have done under similar conditions
  • the specialist standard prevailing in the medical community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

207 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.