Walski v. Tiesenga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that examples of this exception in medical malpractice cases include instruments left in a patient’s body after surgery and X-ray burns
• noting that examples of this exception in medical malpractice cases include instruments left in a patient's body after surgery and X-ray burns
• noting that examples of this exception in medical malpractice cases include instruments left in a patient’s body after surgery and X-ray burns
• affirming directed verdict for defendants where plaintiffs medical expert only testified that he would have acted differently and failed to testify that there was a generally accepted medical standard of care that defendant failed to follow
• expert testimony needed because jurors unskilled in practice of medicine would have difficulty determining lack of scientific skill on part of physician
• the practice of medicine is “a profession which involves the exercise of individual judgment within the framework of established procedures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).