Bruegman v. Bruegman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the government’s claim that the utility would be better off.
• “[Tjhere exists no ‘substitute transaction’ from which plaintiffs are reaping a benefit involving the onetime fee.”
• “Plaintiffs still have the SNF, the government still has the obligation to pick it up, and plaintiffs still have to pay the one-time fee when it becomes due.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).