In Re KRA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, without analysis, the district court complied with its duty under Rule 52(a) by outlining its findings and separately stating its conclusions of law
• concluding, without analysis, the district court complied with its duty under Rule 52(a) by outlining its findings and separately stating its conclusions of law
• separately addressing the mother’s argument that the district court’s Rule 52(a) findings were inadequate and that its decision was contrary to the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).